Indigenous Forest Conservation Model Based Local Wisdom of Great Wamesa Clan in Teluk Wondama West Papua
Model Pelestarian Hutan Adat Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Suku Besar Wamesa di Teluk Wondama Papua Barat
-
(1) * Ahmad Sofwani
Institut Pertanian Malang
Indonesia
(2) Hendrik Kurube Universitas Brawijaya, Malang
Indonesia
(3) Choirul Saleh Universitas Brawijaya, Malang
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to analyze and describe the Indigenous Law Society (ILS) of Great Wamesa Clan in West Papua for conserved the Indigenous Forest based on the norm coventions of Siweruri Kuweta. This research is motivated by the existence of massive deforestation and forest degradation which has a serious impact on infrastructure and forest ecosystems in Indonesia. Thus placing Indonesia in unsustainable forest management, and is considered a crime against with nature. Currently, West Papua still has a sustainable forest of 81%, has a wealth of various wildlife species and various types of ecosystems (mega-Biodiversity). Therefore, the Papua Barat Government was trying to suppress the rate of deforestation with a forest development pattern based on local wisdom. This study uses qualitative methods, the data in the study are in the form of; primary and secondary data obtained from exploration results in the field through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentations which are then analyzed and concluded, resulting in empirical findings that can be used as theoretical studies, and Applicable recommendations in the context of sustainable forestry development. The results shows that ILS has consistently and continuously conserved for the Indigenous forest wisely based on the norms and traditions of Siweruri Kuweta. So that the resources and ecosystem of the Indigenous forest are maintained in balance. This condition is supported by government policies in the form of laws and regulations that are ideal in supporting the existence of ILS. As well as the implementation of a CSR (corporate social responsibility) program in an effort to improve the quality of human resources and the welfare of ILS. The researcher concludes that through the support of government policies, as well as the implementation of CSR programs can support the existence of ILS as a social buffer in the effort of sustainable forest conservation.
References
[2] Awang SA. Sosiologi pengetahuan deforestasi: Konstruksi sosial dan perlawanan. Debut Press; 2006.
[3] Yeny I, Innah HS. Kajian pelaksanaan Pembinaan Masyarakat Desa Hutan (PMDH) di Papua. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan 2007;4:73–91.
[4] Padmanaba M, Sheil D, Basuki I, Liswanti N. Accessing local knowledge to identify where species of conservation concern occur in a tropical forest landscape. Environmental Management 2013;52:348–59.
[5] Salosa ST, Suryanto P, Purwanto RH, others. Hutan Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat Hatam Di Lingkungan Cagar Alam Pegunungan Arfak (Forest in Hatam Community Live on Arfak Mountains Natural Reserve Environment). Jurnal Manusia Dan Lingkungan 2014;21:349–55.
[6] Wiersum KF, Lescuyer G, Nketiah KS, Wit M. International forest governance regimes: Reconciling concerns on timber legality and forest-based livelihoods. Forest Policy and Economics 2013;32:1–5.
[7] Suharyo SS. Perlindungan Hukum Pertanahan Adat Di Papua Dalam Negara Kesejahteraan. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 2019;8:461. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i3.330.
[8] Sekilas Papua. Pemerintah Provinsi Papua 2016:1–6.
[9] Udayana U. Normatif Fakultas Hukum 2015.
[10] Soepomo R. bab-bab tentang hukum adat, PT. Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta 1987.
[11] Sari WKK. SISTEM PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN ADAT MASYARAKAT KARAMPUANG DI DESA TOMPOBULU, KECAMATAN BULUPODDO, KABUPATEN SINJAI, SULAWESI SELATAN. UNIVERSITAS HASANUDDIN, 2021.
[12] Laturette AI. Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Sasi 2016;22:52–66.
[13] Wulandari C, Kaskoyo H, Febryano IG, Bakri S, Safe’i R, Yuwono SB. Provokasi arsitektur pemikiran konsep dan strategi menuju pengelolaan hutan berkelanjutan 2016:1–134.
[14] Koentjaraningrat K. Manusia dan kebudayaan di Indonesia.[Humans and culture in Indonesia]. Jakarta: Djambatan 2010.
[15] Nilasari A, Murtilaksono K, Soetarto E. Tipologi konflik kawasan hutan pada proses penataan batas di wilayah Pulau Bangka. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 2017;5:176–83.
[16] Marfai MA. Pengantar etika lingkungan dan Kearifan lokal. UGM PRESS; 2019.
[17] Thamrin H. Kearifan lokal dalam pelestarian lingkungan (the lokal wisdom in environmental sustainable). Kutubkhanah 2013;16:46–59.
[18] Sufia R, Sumarmi S, Amirudin A. Kearifan lokal dalam melestarikan lingkungan hidup (studi kasus masyarakat adat Desa Kemiren Kecamatan Glagah Kabupaten Banyuwangi). Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan 2016;1:726–31.
[19] Senoaji G. Pemanfaatan Hutan Dan Lingkungan Oleh Masyarakat Baduy Di Banten Selatan (the Uses of Forest and the Environment by Baduy Community in South Banten, Indonesia). Jurnal Manusia Dan Lingkungan 2004;11:143–9.
[20] Lampe M. Kearifan Lingkungan dalam Wujud Kelembagaan, Kepercayaan/Keyakinan, dan Praktik, Belajar dari Kasus Komunitas-Komunitas Nelayan Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Sulawesi Selatan. Lokakarya Menggali Nelayan-Nelayan Kearifan Lingkungan Di Sulawesi Selatan 2006.
[21] Emerson K, Murchie P. Collaborative governance and climate change. The Future of Public Administrafion around the World 2011:141.
[22] Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2008;18:543–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
[23] Miles H, Huberman AM. \&Saldana.(2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook 2018;3.
[24] Moleong J. L.(2014). Qualitative Research Methodology Bandung: PT Youth Rosdakarya 2014.
[25] Liliweri A. Introduction to Cultural Studies. Bandung: Nusa Media 2014.
Copyright (c) 2022 ahmad sofwani, Hendrik Kurube, Choirul Saleh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
