Vol. 1 (2021): Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference On Intelectuals Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2020)
Articles

Relationship of Participative planning, Planning Alignment and Regional Development Performance: Evidence from Special Region of Yogyakarta

Andilo Toham
IPB University
Ernan Rustiadi
IPB University
Bambang Juanda
IPB University
Rilus Kinseng
IPB University
Published January 30, 2021
Keywords
  • Online Teaching,
  • Learning,
  • COVID19
How to Cite
Toham, A., Rustiadi, E., Juanda, B., & Kinseng, R. (2021). Relationship of Participative planning, Planning Alignment and Regional Development Performance: Evidence from Special Region of Yogyakarta . Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 49-56. https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v1i.18

Abstract

Participatory planning is a necessity. Unfortunately, participatory planning has various problems that make it ineffective. Human resource capacity as an input factor for participatory planning is still inadequate. The participatory planning process has not optimized the best way of producing the outputs that are needed by the community. Spatial aspects of planning, activities in the space, and budgeting must be aligned. However, empirical facts show the inconsistency of development planning. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between community participation in planning and regional development performance through spatial planning, development, and budget planning alignment, as the mediating variable. This study explore measurement of all three variables using quantitative indicators. The results of this study, using SEM PLS, indicate that the direct relationship of community participation and the performance of infrastructure development is significant if it does not include the mediation variable.  Process, results of participatory planning, alignment of spatial and development plans, and alignment of strategic plans with work plans are significant variables. Therefore, local governments need to make efforts to improve participation processes in spatial planning and development so as to improve the regional development planning alignment and performance

References

  1. Andiana, Y., Hendrakusumah, E. Sinkronisasi Perencanaan Ruang Wilayah dengan Perencanaan Pembangunan: Studi Kasus Sektor Infrastruktur di Kota Bandung. Prosiding Penelitian SPeSIA Universitas Islam Bandung. 2015
  2. Bahrainy, H, Manshadi EF. The Most Important Skills an Urban Planner Needs In a Developing Country; The Case of Iran. 2017. Planning Practice & Research, vol. 32, No. 4, 466–477
  3. Boddy, M., Hickman, H. The Demise of Strategic Planning? The Impact of Abolition of Regional Spatial Strategy in a Growth Region. 2013. TPR vol 84 No 6 pp 743-768
  4. Brody SD., Godschalk DR., Burby, RJ. Mandating Citizen Participation in Plan Making Six Strategic Planning Choices. 2003. Journal of the American Planning Association. Spring 2003 (69;3) pp 245-264
  5. Buhr, N., Rode, M., Kanning, H. Effectiveness of Planning Instruments for Minimizing Spatial Conflicts of Biogas Production. 2014. European Planning Studies. Vol 22 No 8 pp1711-1734
  6. Buckwalter, ND. The Potential for Public Empowerment through Government‐Organized Participation. 2014. Public Administration Review. Volume 74, Issue 5
  7. Chong, V., Eggleton, I., Leong, MK. The Multiple Roles of Participative Budgeting on Job Performance. 2006. Advanced in Accounting. Vol 22 pp 67-95
  8. Clinton, B., Hunton, JE. Linking Participative Budgeting Congruence to Organization Performance. 2001. Behavioural Research in Accounting. Vol 13 pp 127-141
  9. Enserink, B., Alberton, M. Public Participation in China: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Lessons Learned. 2016. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 18(1), 1-21. doi:10.2307/enviassepolimana.18.1.06
  10. Hair, JF, Hult, GTM, Ringle, CM, Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). California. SAGE Publication Inc. 2014.
  11. Juanda, B., Handra, H. Reformasi Mekanisme Dana Alokasi Khusus untuk Mendorong Pertumbuhan dan Pemerataan Pembangunan di Indonesia. 2017. Seri Kertas Kerja KOMPAK Nomor 2, Mei 2017.
  12. Joris de Vente, Reed, M , Stringer L, Valente S, Newig J. How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands. 2016. Ecology and Society, Vol. 21, No. 2
  13. Kellog, WK. Using Logic Models to Bring Together Planning, Evaluation, and Action Logic Model Development Guide. WK Kellog Foundation. Michigan. 2004.
  14. Kusakabe, E. Advancing Sustainable Development at Local Level: The Case of Machizukuri in Japanese Cities. 2013. Progress in Planning Vol 80 pp 1-65
  15. Leach. MAL, Participative Budgeting, Performance and Job Satisfaction: A Cultural Study Managers Working for Multinational Firm in South Eastern United States and The US-Mexico Border. 2002. [Dissertation] Mississippi. Mississippi State University.
  16. Low, K. Exploring The Quality of Stakeholder Representation in Regional Planning. 2014. [Dissertation]. Ohio. University of Akron
  17. Morphet, J. Local Integrated Spatial Planning – the Changing Role in England. 2009. TPR 80(45) pp 393-414
  18. Nenkovic-Riznic, M., Ristic Vladica, MS., Maksin, M. Integration of Strategic Environmental Assessment and Environmental Social Impact Assessment into Strategic Territorial Planning: Lessons Learned from Two Cases of Tourism Destination in Protected Areas. 2016. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies Vol 25 No 3 pp1353-1366
  19. Neshkova, M., Guo, H. Public Participation and Organizational Performance: Evidence from State Agencies. 2012. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 22(2), 267-288. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/23250882
  20. Nurcholis, H. Perencanaan Partisipatif Pemerintah Daerah. Jakarta. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. 2009.
  21. Portman, ME. Marine Spatial Planning: achieving and evaluating integration. 2011. ICES Journal of Marine Science (2011), 68(10), pp 2191–2200
  22. Rachman, A. The Effect of Organization Commitment and Procedural Fairness on Participative Budgeting and Its Implication to Performance Moderating by Management Accounting Information. 2014. Review of Integrative Bussines and Economics Research. Vol 3(1) pp 201-218
  23. Rustiadi, E., Panuju DR., Saefulhakim, S. Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah. Jakarta. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia. 2011.
  24. Shaw, D., Sykes, O. Investigating the application of the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) to regional planning in the United Kingdom. 2013. TPR, 74 (1) pp 31-50
  25. Sholihin, Mahfud, Ratmono Dwi. “ Analisis SEM-PLS dengan Wrap PLS 3.0 untuk Hubungan Nonlinier dalam Penelitian Sosial dan Bisnis”. Penerbit Andi Offset. Yogyakarta. 2013.
  26. Sopanah, A., Wahyudi, I. Public participation and empowerment strategies for supervision of the implementation of the budget process in Malang”, Proceeding of Research Symposium II ISEI, November 23-24 Surabaya, Indonesia. 2005.
  27. Tripplet, Kimberly. Citizen Voice and Public Involvement in Transportation Decisionmaking: A Model for Citizen Engagement. 2015. Race, Gender & Class Vol. 22, No. 3-4, , pp. 83-106