Vol. 1 (2021): Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference On Intelectuals Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2020)
Articles

Measurement and Analysis of Differences in The Impact of The Implementation of Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB) Based on The Mann Whitney Test

Bambang Budiarto
Universitas Surabaya
Published January 30, 2021
Keywords
  • Impact,
  • Large-Scale Social Restrictions (Psbb),
  • Mann Whitney Test
How to Cite
Budiarto, B. (2021). Measurement and Analysis of Differences in The Impact of The Implementation of Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB) Based on The Mann Whitney Test. Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v1i.23

Abstract

This research is a non-parametric statistical measurement form which use the Mann Whitney Test. The aim is to determine whether or not there are differences in the impact of the implementation of the PSBB as a result of Covid-19 pandemic in the Surabaya, Gresik and Sidoarjo areas through the distribution of questionnaires and interviews, a sample of 134 people who were distributed in the 3 regions obtained. From the results of repeated simulations, measurements and testing to answer existing hypotheses, it can be seen that there are 3 things that are the conclusions of this study. The first conclusion, that there is no difference in the impact of the PSBB implementation in the Sidoarjo and Surabaya areas, which use α = 5%, the value obtained Zcount = -0.65745 is higher than Ztabel = +/- 1.96. It is in the receiving area which means H0 or the hypothesis that there is no difference in the impact of the PSBB implementation between Sidoarjo and Surabaya areas cannot be rejected. The second conclusion, that there are differences in the impact of the PSBB implementation in the Surabaya and Gresik areas with the result that the value of Zcount = -2.28792 is lower than Ztable. The same thing happened in the third test, there was a significant difference in the impact of the PSBB implementation in Sidoarjo and Gresik areas. Furthermore, in the descriptive analysis, there are several factors were found which effect the three tests result, as follows: geographic, demographic, social, cultural and employment factors.

References

  1. Badan Pusat Statistik, 2020. Laporan Tahunan Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), beberapa tahun penerbitan, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  2. Bambang Budiarto, Firman Rosjadi, 2019. DEA as an Alternative Instrument of Performance Measurement: Case Study 5 Sidoarjo Small Industry December 2018, Proceedings of The 17th International Symposium of Management (Insyma 2020), Jurusan Manajemen Fakultas Bisnis & Ekonomika Universitas Surabaya (Ubaya), Surbaya.
  3. Bambang Budiarto, 2020a. Simulasi Pengukuran Survival Ability Unit Kegiatan Ekonomi Selama Pelaksanaan Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen 5 (pp 1331-1342, ISSN: 2654-3664, Jurusan Manajemen Universitas Negeri Surabaya (UNESA), Surabaya.
  4. Bambang Budiarto, 2020b. Ketahanan Sektor Informal Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Kabupaten Sidoarjo, Journal of Economics Development Issues (JEDI), Vol 3 No. 2, 2020 (pp 349-460), e-ISSN: 2416-2384. Program Studi Ekonoi Pembangunan, Fakultas Ekonomi-Bisnis UPN Veteran Jawa Timur, Surabaya.
  5. Catur Sugiyanto, 2019, Kajian Literatur dan Arah Topik Riset Ke Depan: Index Pembangunan Manusia, edisi revisi, Penerbit Andi, Yogyakarta.
  6. Damodar N. Gujarati, 2016. Basic Econometrics, McGRAW-HILL International Editions, Fifth Edition, Printed in Singapore.
  7. Freddy Mutiara, Ambang Priyonggo, 2020. Analysis of Sustainibility Business Media from Hyperlocal and Entrepreneurial Journalism Perspectives: a Case Study of DI’s Way Daily, Journal of Entrepreneurship & Business, Vol. 1 No. 2, ISSN:2721-706X.
  8. M. Cleveland, J.I. Rojas-Mendez, M. Laroche, dan N. Papadopoulus, 2016. Identity, Culture, Dispositions and Behavior: A Cross-national Examination of Globalization and Culture Change, Journal Business Research, 69 (3), 1090-1102.
  9. Nugroho Budiyuwono, 1996, Pengantar Statistik Ekonomi dan Perusahaan-Jilid 2, edisi revisi, UPP AMP YKPN, Yogyakarta.
  10. Octavia Elvana Indra Putri, Aluisius Hery Pratono, Firman Rosjadi, 2019. Analisis Hubungan Antara Kewarganegaraan Global dan Budaya Konsumen Global: Pengaruh Mediasi Kecerdasan Budaya dan Modernisasi Religiusitas, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Vol 23 No 2 Juni 2019, Jurusan Ilmu Ekonomi Fakultas Bisnis dan Ekonomika Universitas Surabaya (Ubaya), Surabaya.
  11. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2020. Permenkes No 9/2020 Tentang Pedoman Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar dalam Rangka Percepatan Penanganan Coronavirus Disease 2019, Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
  12. Peraturan Gubernur Jawa Timur, 2020. Pergub No 18/2020 Tentang Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar, Surabaya
  13. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, 2020. PP No. 21/2020 Tentang Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar Dalam Rangka Percepatan Penanganan Corona Virus Disease 2019, Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
  14. Peraturan Bupati Sidoarjo, 2020. Perbup No. 31/2020 Tentang Penerapan Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar di Kabupaten Sidoarjo, Sidoarjo: Pemerintah Kabupaten Sidoarjo.
  15. Rahardja dan Manurung, 2008. Teori Ekonomi Makro, Edisi Keempat, LPFEUI, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  16. Singgih Santoso, 2004. Statistik Non Parametrik-Buku Latihan SPSS, Elex Media Komputindo – Gramedia, Cetakan Ketiga, Juni 2004, Jakarta.
  17. Suryani dan Hendriyadi, 2015, Metode Riset Kuantitatif: Teori dan Aplikasi Pada Penelitian Bidang Manajemen dan Ekonomi Islam, Jakarta, Indonesia: Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.
  18. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia, 2020, UU No. 6/2018 Tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan, Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.