Vol. 3 (2022): Proceedings of the 1st SENARA 2022

The Concept of Governmentality in Building the Conceptual Foundation for the Role of Internal Audit in Corporate Governance: Konsep Governmentality dalam Membangun Fondasi Konseptual Peran Audit Internal dalam Tata Kelola Perusahaan

Aisha Hanif
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Dina Dwi Oktavia Rini
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Duwi Rahayu
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Published July 17, 2022
  • internal auditor function,
  • internal control,
  • governmentality
How to Cite
Hanif, A., Rini, D. D. O., & Rahayu, D. (2022). The Concept of Governmentality in Building the Conceptual Foundation for the Role of Internal Audit in Corporate Governance: Konsep Governmentality dalam Membangun Fondasi Konseptual Peran Audit Internal dalam Tata Kelola Perusahaan. Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3, 801-809. https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v3i.235


The concept of supervision (panopticon) initiated by Michael Foucault explains how internal audit is used by management to encourage subjects to monitor themselves. The presence of internal audit produces patterns of employee behavior that make the discursive nature of the exercise of power clear. This interpretation was developed to conceptualize the preventive role of internal auditors in risk management. The concept of governmentality adopted from Foucauldian thought can facilitate the self-assessment of auditee controls used by internal auditors and is an integral part of tools to make subject matter manageable. This study aims to reveal the basic formulation of the internal auditor's strategy to maintain the auditee's trust in the internal auditor. The research method used is a qualitative research method using a phenomenological approach. The research findings state that the auditee has a perceived tendency to be suspicious of the role and function of the internal auditor, so that the auditee tends to be less able to cooperate or support the work of the internal auditor properly because internal audit activities are considered as a monitoring tool that has the effect of disrupting the routine activities of the organization.


Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality.
COSO. (2013). Internal Control – Integrated Framework: Executive Summary, Durham, North California,
Esmark, A. (2018). Limits to liberal government: an alternative history of governmentality. Administration & Society, 50(2), 240–268.
Ferry, L., Murphy, P., & Zakaria, Z. (2015). Implementing Key Performance Indicators in a government agency: a typical story? Journal of Finance and Management in the Public Services., 14(2).
Ferry, L., Zakaria, Z., Zakaria, Z., & Slack, R. (2017). Watchdogs, helpers or protectors?–Internal auditing in Malaysian Local Government. Accounting Forum, 41(4), 375–389.
Hart, O. (1995). Corporate governance: some theory and implications. The Economic Journal, 105(430), 678–689.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia, 2001. Standar Pemeriksaan Akuntan Publik. SA Seksi 319.Pertimbangan Atas Pengendalian Intern Dalam Audit Laporan Keuangan

Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16, S65–S79.
Keasey, K., & Wright, M. (1993). Issues in corporate accountability and governance: An editorial. Accounting and Business Research, 23(sup1), 291–303.
Macdonald, N., & Beattie, A. (1993). The corporate governance jigsaw. Accounting and Business Research, 23(sup1), 304–310.
McNamee, D., & McNamee, T. (1995). The transformation of internal auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal.
Mihret, D. G., & Grant, B. (2017). The role of internal auditing in corporate governance: a Foucauldian analysis. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(3), 699–719. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2012-1134
Mulyadi. (2016). Sistem Akuntansi. Edisi ke-4. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Neu, D. (2006). Accounting for public space. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4–5), 391–414.
Power, M. (2004). The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty (Demos, London).
Radcliffe, V. S. (1998). Efficiency audit: an assembly of rationalities and programmes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(4), 377–410.
Robson, K. (1992). Accounting numbers as “inscription”: Action at a distance and the development of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(7), 685–708.
Romney, Marshall B. dan Steinbart, (2015), “Sistem Informasi Akuntansi”, Edisi 13, alihbahasa: Kikin Sakinah Nur Safira dan Novita Puspasari, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Sarens, G., & De Beelde, I. (2006). Internal auditors’ perception about their role in risk management: A comparison between US and Belgian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal.
Short, H., Keasey, K., Wright, M., & Hull, A. (1999). Corporate governance: From accountability to enterprise. Accounting and Business Research, 29(4), 337–352.
Spira, L. F., & Page, M. (2003). Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
Townley, B. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 518–545.