Vol. 1 (2021): Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference On Intelectuals Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2020)
Articles

Analysis of The Influence of Pentagon Fraud in Detecting Financial Statement Fraud Using Method F- Score

Vina Yusniarti
Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Ahmad Dahlan
Henny Mulyati
Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Ahmad Dahlan
Amrizal Amrizal
Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Ahmad Dahlan
Published March 28, 2021
Keywords
  • Financial Statement Fraud,
  • Pentagon Fraud
How to Cite
Yusniarti, V., Mulyati, H., & Amrizal, A. (2021). Analysis of The Influence of Pentagon Fraud in Detecting Financial Statement Fraud Using Method F- Score. Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 40-56. https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v1i.42

Abstract

This study aims to examine the elements of fraud in the  fraud  pentagon theory in detecting financial statement fraud. Pentagon fraud is variables from the pressure element, opportunity, rationalization, capability, and elements of arrogance, namely political relationships which are hypothesized to affect financial statement fraud. The F-Score method is used to determine financial statement fraud. This research  sample was selected using the purposive sampling method from 47 manufacturing companies in the basic industry and chemicals industry listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in the period 2015 to 2019. Hypothesis testing uses multiple regression analysis models using SPSS 22 to test the effect of the target. finance, financial stability, external pressure, institutional share ownership, ineffective supervision,  influence on  the nature of the industry, quality of external auditors, replacement of auditors, change of directors and political relations to financial statement fraud. The results showed that the quality of external auditors and auditor turnover had a significant positive effect on financial statement fraud. Meanwhile, financial targets, financial stability, external pressure, institutional share ownership, ineffective supervision, the influence of the nature of the industry, the change of directors, and political relations have no effect on financial statement fraud.

References

  1. ACFE (2018): Report To the Nations 2018 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse Asia Pacific Edition (Vol.10). Retrieved from https://www.acfe.com/uploadedFiles/ACFE_Website/Content/rttn/2018/RTT N-Asia-Pacific-
  2. Edition.pdf
  3. Agoes, Sukrisno . 201 7 . Auditing: Practical Guidelines for Accountant Examination by Public Accounting Firms . Issue 5 . South Jakarta : Four Salemba.
  4. Agusputri , Hanifah and Sofie . 201 9 . Factors Affecting Frauduluent Financial Reporting Using Pentagon Fraud Analysis . Faculty of Economics and Business, Trisakti University: Jakarta. Journal of Tax Information, Accounting and Public Finance Vol 14 No. July 2, 2019: 105-124.
  5. Arens, Alvin.A Randal J. Elder and Mark S. Beasley . 201 5 . Auditing and Assurance Service, Fifteenth Ediition . Volume 1 . Jakarta : Erlangga Publisher.
  6. Arens, Alvin.A Randal J. Elder and Mark S. Beasley . 201 5 . Auditing and Assurance Service,
  7. Fifteenth Ediition . Volume 2 . Jakarta : Erlangga Publisher
  8. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. 2012. Report to Nations.
  9. Indonesia stock exchange. 20 20 . About the IDX. In https // www.idx.co.id /
  10. Chaney, PK, Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The Quality Of Accounting Information In Politically Connected Firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics , Vol. 51: No. 1: 58-76.
  11. Cressey, D. 1953. Other people's money; a study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Glencoe, IL: FreePress.
  12. Dechow, PM, Ge, W., Larson, CR, & Sloan, RG (2011). Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research , Vol. 28 No. 1, 17–82. Available athttps:
  13. //doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x
  14. Ghozali, Imam. 2016. Multivariete Analysis Application with IBM SPSS 23 Program (8th Edition) . VIII printing. Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency .
  15. Ghozali. (2013). Multivariate Analysis Application with IBM SPSS 21 Program (Fifth Edition). Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.
  16. Heviana , Ema . 201 7 . Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Testing the Pentagon's Fraud Theory at State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) for the 2012-2016 Period . Essay. Faculty of Economics and Business, State Islamic University (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah: Jakarta.
  17. International Federation of Accountants. 2010. International Standards of Auditing.
  18. Jensen, MC, & Meckling, WH (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics , Vol. 3 No 4, 305–360. Available athttps: //doi.org/10.1016/0304- 405X (76) 90026-X
  19. Legowo , Indar Satria . 201 9 . The Influence of Pentagon Fraud Factors and Audit Committee Expertise on Fraudulent Financial Reporting . Essay. Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Pancasakti University: Tegal.
  20. Nuraina, Elva. 2012. The Influence of Institutional Ownership and Company Size on Debt Policy and Firm Value (Study on Manufacturing Companies Listed on the IDX). Madiun: Journal of Business and Economics . Vol. 19, No. 2.
  21. Priantara, Diaz. 2013. Fraud Auditing & Investigation . Mitra Wacana Media, Jakarta.
  22. Rahmanti, MM, & Daljono. (2013). Fraud Detection of Financial Statements through Pressure and Opportunity Risk Factors (Case Study of Companies Receiving Sanctions from Bapepam 2002-2006 Period). Journal of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business , Diponegoro University , Vol. 2 No. 2 , 1–12.
  23. Saptarini , Galih Devi . 201 9 . Early Warning System for Financial Report Fraud Based on Pentagon Fraud Analysis . Faculty of Economics, Indonesian Islamic University, Yogyakarta. Mendeley . Journal of Accounting. 3 (2) .
  24. Sihombing, KS, & Rahardjo, SN (2014). Diamond Fraud Analysis in Detecting Financial Statement Fraud: An Empirical Study of Manufacturing Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) 2010-2012, Diponegoro Journal of Accounting Vol. 03 No. 02.ISSN (Online): 2337 - 3806.
  25. Skousen, CJ, & Twedt, BJ (2009). Fraud in Emerging Markets: A Cross Country Analysis.
  26. Skousen, et al. 2009. Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of the Fraud Triangle and SAS No.99. In CJ Skousen, KR Smith, & C. j. Wright, Advances in Financial Economics (pp. 53-81). Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  27. Sugiyono . 2016. Quantitative Research Methods, Qualitative and R & D . 26th printing . Bandung : Alfabeta Publisher.
  28. Sugiyono . 201 3 . Statistics For Research . The 27th edition . Bandung : Alfabeta Publisher.
  29. Suwardjono . 201 4 . Financial Reporting Engineering Accounting Territory . Third edition, 8th edition . Yogyakarta : Publisher BPFE-Yogyakarta.
  30. Zelin , Cintia . 201 8 . Pentagon Fraud Analysis in Detecting Fraud Financial Statements Using the Fraud Score Model . Essay. Faculty of Economics, Islamic University of Indonesia: Yogyakarta.