Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities
Vol. 1 (2021): Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference On Intelectuals Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2020)
Articles

The Effectiveness of RADEC as a Distance Learning Model to Improve the Understanding of Class XI SHS Students on Dynamic Fluid Materials

PDF
  • Salsabila Indana Zulfa,
  • Monica Widyaswari,
  • Ulya Aziza Fitriya
Salsabila Indana Zulfa
Universitas Negeri Malang
Monica Widyaswari
Universitas Negeri Malang
Ulya Aziza Fitriya
Universitas Negeri Malang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v1i.46
Published January 30, 2021
Keywords
  • RADEC Learning Model,
  • Distance Learning,
  • Students’ understanding
How to Cite
Zulfa, S. I., Widyaswari, M., & Fitriya, U. A. (2021). The Effectiveness of RADEC as a Distance Learning Model to Improve the Understanding of Class XI SHS Students on Dynamic Fluid Materials. Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 223-228. https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v1i.46

Copyright (c) 2021 Salsabila Indana Zulfa, Monica Widyaswari, Ulya Aziza Fitriya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This study aims to determine the RADEC learning model's effectiveness in improving understanding of dynamic fluid material to XI students of Senior High School (SHS) in distance learning (distance learning). This study used a quasi-experimental method with a nonequivalent control group design. The research population was all students of XI SHS classes, totalling 154 people. The sampling technique used purposive sampling. The sample is XI-3 class as the control group and XI-4 class as the experimental group. The instrument used was a cognitive test. The data analysis technique used descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. The results showed that the two groups' average value is that the pre-test control group was 58.12, and the post-test was 78.13, while the pre-test and post-test experimental group were 76.72 and 87.19. Thus, it can be concluded that the RADEC learning model is more effective than the conventional learning model.

PDF

References

  1. Richards JC. Creativity in language teaching. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research. 2013;1(3):19–43.
  2. Dhawan S. Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. :18.
  3. Wotto M. The Future High Education Distance Learning in Canada, the United States, and France: Insights From Before COVID-19 Secondary Data Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2020 Dec;49(2):262–81.
  4. Adams B, Wilson NS. Building Community in Asynchronous Online Higher Education Courses Through Collaborative Annotation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2020 Dec;49(2):250–61.
  5. Chatterjee I, Chakraborty P. Use of Information Communication Technology by Medical Educators Amid COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2020 Oct 20;004723952096699.
  6. Goyal JK, Daipuria P, Jain S. An Alternative Structure of Delivering Management Education in India. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2020 Oct 8;004723952095861.
  7. Sopandi W, Handayani H. The Impact of Workshop on Implementation of Read- Answer-Discuss-Explain-And-Create (RADEC) Learning Model on Pedagogic Competency of Elementary School Teachers. In Padang, Indonesia: Atlantis Press; 2019.
  8. Satria E, Sopandi W. Applying RADEC model in science learning to promoting students’ critical thinking in elementary school. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2019 Oct;1321:032102.
  9. Pratama YA, Sopandi W, Hidayah Y. RADEC Learning Model (Read-Answer-Discuss- Explain And Create): The Importance of Building Critical Thinking Skills In Indonesian Context. IntJEduVocStudies. 2019 Jun 28;1(2).
  10. Eri Susmiati. Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Bahasa Indonesia Melalui Penerapan Model Discovery Learning dan Media Video Dalam Kondisi Pandemi Covid-19 bagi. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan. 2020;7(3):36–40.
  11. Argaw AS, Haile BB, Ayalew BT, Kuma SG. The Effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Instruction on Students’ Motivation and Problem-solving Skills of Physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2016;13(3).
  12. Celik P, Onder F, Silay I. The effects of problem-based learning on the students’ success in physics course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;28:656–60.
  13. Yulianti D. Problem-Based Learning Model Used to Scientific Approach Based Worksheet for Physics to Develop Senior High School Students Characters. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2017 Apr 18;824:012009.
  14. Serway RA, Jewett JW. Physics for Scientist and Engineers with Modern Physics 9th Edition. 2014. 777–852 p.
  15. Giancoli D. Fisika Jilid 1. 5th ed. Jakarta: Erlangga; 2001.
  16. Komariyah L, Karimah M. The Effect of Experimental Skills toward Senior High School Students’ Critical Thinking Abilities through Discovery Learning Model. In: Proceedings of the Educational Sciences International Conference (ESIC 2018). Samarinda, Indonesia: Atlantis Press; 2019.
  17. Safitri AD, Lesmono AD, Maryani, Wardoyo AA. Development of learning media using VBA excel in physical learning in senior high school. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2020 Jun;1563:012035.
  18. Karlina D, Sopandi W, Sujana A. Critical Thinking Skills of Fourth Grade in Light Properties Materials through the Radec Model. The 2nd International Conference on Elementary Education. 2019;2:1743–53.
  19. Oliver KL, Oesterreich HA, Aranda R, Archeleta J, Blazer C, de la Cruz K, et al. ‘The sweetness of struggle’: innovation in physical education teacher education through student-centered inquiry as curriculum in a physical education methods course. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2015 Jan 2;20(1):97–115.
  20. Winschel GA, Everett RK, Coppola BP, Shultz GV, Lonn S. Using Jigsaw-Style Spectroscopy Problem-Solving To Elucidate Molecular Structure through Online Cooperative Learning. J Chem Educ. 2015 Jul 14;92(7):1188–93.
  21. Temel S. The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability. SAJE. 2014;34(1):1– 20