Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities
Vol. 1 (2021): Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference On Intelectuals Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2020)
Articles

The Effect of Lecturer Competence in Online Learning Methods on Student College Satisfaction During the Pandemic

PDF
  • Asty Khairi Inayah Syahwani,
  • Annisaa Soeyono
Asty Khairi Inayah Syahwani
IPB University
Annisaa Soeyono
IPB University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v1i.53
Published January 30, 2021
Keywords
  • COVID-19,
  • Online Teaching And Learning,
  • Lecturer’s Competence,
  • Satisfaction
How to Cite
Syahwani, A. K. I., & Soeyono, A. (2021). The Effect of Lecturer Competence in Online Learning Methods on Student College Satisfaction During the Pandemic. Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 239-250. https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v1i.53

Copyright (c) 2021 Asty Khairi Inayah Syahwani, Annisaa Soeyono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The first quarter of 2020 has been a difficult time for the global community. The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is affecting various sectors, one of which is education. Physical distancing policies allow learning to be done remotely. Based on the conditions of distance learning, this study wanted to determine the effect of lecturer co mpetence on student satisfaction during a pandemic. The data was collected by distributing questionnaires to college students using purpose sampling. Data analysis using SEM-PLS method. The results showed that social and personality competence had an effect on student satisfaction, but lecturers' pedagogical and professional competence had no effect on student satisfaction during the pandemic. This can be shown from the inadequate infrastructure of distance learning. Lecturers who are needed now are lecturers who have the power of creativity in delivering material so that the delivery of material to students is more interesting and varied in online learning.

PDF

References

  1. Mailizar M, Fan L. Indonesian Teachers' Knowledge of ICT and the Use of ICT in Secondary Mathematics Teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2020;16(1).
  2. Wu, J. Y., Hsiao, Y. C., & Nian, M. W. (2020). Using supervised machine learning on large -scale online forums to classify course-related Facebook messages in predicting learning achievement within the personal learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(1), 65-80.
  3. Allo MD. Is the online learning good in the midst of Covid-19 Pandemic? The case of EFL learners. Jurnal Sinestesia. 2020 Apr 23;10(1):1 -0.
  4. Djamarah SB. Guru dan anak didik dalam interaksi edukatif. Rineka cipta; 2000.
  5. Robbins SP, Judge TA. Organizational Behavior, concepts, theories and applications. Tehran: Institute of Commercial Researches. 2001.
  6. Harisantoso J. Pengukuran Kinerja Dosen melalui EKD (Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen) STKIP PGRI Situbondo Berdasarkan Persepsi Mahasiswa. Sainteks. 2012 Oct 1;9(2).
  7. Hamidi M, Indrastuti S. Influence Analysis of Competence, Educational Background on Performance
  8. PolikteknikBengkalis Lecturer of Leadership Perspective. InProceedings of the National Seminar on Industry and Technology 2012 Dec 26.
  9. Angmalisang H. Pengaruh Kepribadian Guru terhadap Kinerja Mengajar di SMA Kristen” Irene” Manado. Jurnal Engineering Education Journals (E2 -J Unima). 2011;1(3).
  10. Irianto H. Consumers' attitude and intention towards organic food purchase: An extension of theory of planned behavior in gender perspective. International journal of management, economics and social sciences. 2015 Mar 13;4(1):17 -31.
  11. Putri SD, Suwatno S. Pengaruh kompetensi pedagogik dan kompetensi sosial terhadap prestasi belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran pengantar administrasi perkantoran kelas X administrasi perkantoran di SMK Negeri 1 Subang. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran (JPManper).;2(2):113 -23.
  12. Juniantari IG, Kusmariyatni NN. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Two Stay Two Stray Berbantuan Mind Mapping terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar. 2019;3(3):378-86.
  13. Hakim, A. (2015). Contribution of competence teacher (pedagogical, personality, professional competence and social) on the performance of learning. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 4(2), 1-12.
  14. Wains SI, Mahmood W. Integrating m-learning with e-learning. InProceedings of the 9th ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education 2008 Oct 16 (pp. 31-38).
  15. Tømte C, Enochsson AB, Buskqvist U, Kårstein A. Educating online student teachers to master professional digital competence: The TPACK-framework goes online. Computers & Education. 2015 May 1;84:26-35.
  16. Debourgh GA. Technology is the tool, teaching is the task: Student satisfaction in distance learning. InSociety for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 1999 (pp. 131-137). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  17. Kunter M, Klusmann U, Baumert J, Richter D, Voss T, Hachfeld A. Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2013 Aug;105(3):805.
  18. Latip MS, May RY, Arif M, Kadir A, Kwan TC. Does program fees affect the relationship between lecturers’ competencies and student’satisfaction in the digital era? A case of Malaysia higher education. International Journal Of Academic Research In Business And Social Sciences. 2019 Jul;9(7).
  19. Volery T, Lord D. Critical success factors in online education. International journal of educational
  20. management. 2000 Sep 1.
  21. Brophy J. Generic aspects of effective teaching. Tomorrow’s teachers. 2001:3 -45.
  22. Swan K. Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance education. 2001 Jan 1;22(2):306 -31.
  23. Shea PJ, Pickett AM, Pelz WE. A follow-up investigation of “teaching presence” in the SUNY Learning Network. Journal of asynchronous learning networks. 2003 Jul 2;7(2):61 -80.
  24. Swan K. Developing social presence in online course discussions. Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices. 2003 Dec 16:147 -64.
  25. Popescu-Mitroi MM, Todorescu LL, Greculescu A. Quality assurance and classroom management in the study of English in technical higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015 Jun 2;191:1917-22.
  26. Jaya IG, Sumertajaya IM. Structural Equation Modeling With Partial Least Square. Proceedings Semnas Mathematics and Mathematics Education. 2008.
  27. Juliandi AZ. Structural Equation Model Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) dengan SmartPLS. Batam: Universitas Batam. 2018.
  28. Ghozali I. Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro; 2006.
  29. Spencer MH. Economía contemporánea. Reverte; 1993.
  30. Adri M. Pemanfaatan Internet sebagai sumber pembelajaran. IlmuKomputer. Com.[Diakses Januari 2013]. 2007.
  31. Leander R, Buishand TA. Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme river flows. Journal of Hydrology. 2007 Jan 15;332(3 -4):487-96