Agricultural Insurance Models in Banyumas, Indonesia: Potentials, Problems, and Challenges Model Asuransi Pertanian di Banyumas, Indonesia : Potensi, Permasalahan, dan Tantangan

Main Article Content

Faefaya Ziadatul Anisa
Sodik Dwi Purnomo
Diah Retnowati
Bagus Adhitya
Zumaeroh

Abstract

Farming businesses are constantly faced with the risk of uncertainty due to climate change. The risk of uncertainty affected the destruction of farming infrastructure and a high level of crop failure. Furthermore, the research objective was to 1) identify the potential of the agricultural sector in Panusupan Village, Cilongok District Banyumas Regency, 2) analyze the factors that influence farmers' interest in participating in the insurance program in Panusupan Village, Cilongok District Banyumas Regency, 3) identify the inhibiting and driving factors in farmers participating in the agricultural insurance program in Panusupan Village, Cilongok District Banyumas Regency, 4) identify the stakeholders involved in the development of agricultural insurance in Panusupan Village, Cilongok District Banyumas Regency, and 5) formulate agricultural insurance development models in Panusupan Village, Cilongok District Banyumas Regency. This research applied a mixed-method approach of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Additionally, the research methods were the Miles and Huberman approach and binary logistic regression analysis. The research population consisted of farmers in Panusupan Village, Cilongok District Banyumas Regency.  The research results indicated that Panusupan Village could join the agricultural insurance program seen from the extensive agricultural land and could be pretty good. It can be seen from the amount of land used; farmer groups classified as active; people whose jobs were primarily farmers; and many agencies that provided agricultural insurance socialization. The binary logistic regression results showed that age, education, income, number of family dependents, land area, farming experience, the intensity of crop failure, socialization participation had significant effects on farmers' interest in participating in agricultural insurance programs in Panusupan Village, Cilongok District Banyumas Regency. Technology had no significant effect on farmers' interest in participating in the agricultural insurance program in Panusupan Village, Cilongok District Banyumas Regency. Barriers and drivers in the development of agricultural insurance included internal and external factors.

Article Details

How to Cite
Anisa, F. Z., Purnomo, S. D., Retnowati, D., Adhitya, B., & Zumaeroh. (2022). Agricultural Insurance Models in Banyumas, Indonesia: Potentials, Problems, and Challenges : Model Asuransi Pertanian di Banyumas, Indonesia : Potensi, Permasalahan, dan Tantangan . Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3, 156-166. https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v3i.171
Section
Articles

References

[1] V. L. Damayanti dan R. Khoirudin, “Analisis Faktor - Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Ketahanan Pangan Rumah Tangga Petani (Studi Kasus : Desa Timbulharjo, Sewon, Bantul),” J. Ekon. Stud. Pembang., vol. 17, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.18196/jesp.17.2.3735.
[2] F. Elhusna, M. Noer, dan Y. Yuerlita, “Analisis Keikutsertaan Petani Dalam Asuransi Usahatani Padi (AUTP) Di Kecamatan Pariaman Timur,” JOSETA J. Socio-economics Trop. Agric., vol. 1, no. 3, hal. 58–67, 2019, doi: 10.25077/joseta.v1i2.146.
[3] Praptono Djunedi, “Analisis Asuransi Pertanian di Indonesia : Konsep, Tantangan dan Prospek,” J. Borneo Adm., vol. 12, no. 1, hal. 9–27, 2016.
[4] Kementerian Pertanian, “Petunjuk Teknis Pelaksanaan Asuransi Usahatani,” 2016.
[5] H. Supriyanto, Urgensi Asuransi Pertanian. Harianbhirawa, 2021.
[6] Kementerian Pertanian, “Asuransi Usahatani Padi, Solusi Kegagalan Panen,” 2019.
[7] Kementerian Pertanian, “25 Ribu ha sawah di banyumas ditargetkan ikuti asuransi pertanian,” 2021.
[8] I. Sayugyaningsih, Suprehatin, dan N. N. Mahdi, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Petani Mengikuti Asuransi Usahatani Padi (Autp) Di Kecamatan Kaliori, Rembang,” Risal. Kebijak. Pertan. DAN Lingkung. Rumusan Kaji. Strateg. Bid. Pertan. dan Lingkung., vol. 7, no. 2, hal. 104–122, 2020, doi: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v7i2.33746.
[9] A. Habib, “ANALISIS FAKTOR – FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PRODUKSI JAGUNG,” J. Ilmu Pertan., vol. 18, no. 79–87, 2018.
[10] D. Salvatore, Theory and Problem of Micro Economic Theory, 3rdEdition ed. Jakarta: Penebit Erlangga, 2016.
[11] S. Soekartawi, Ilmu Usahatani dan Penelitian untuk Pengembangan Petani Kecil. Jakarta: Ui-Press, 2011.
[12] K. Surtiyah, Ilmu Usahatani. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya, 2016.
[13] A. Shinta, Ilmu Usahatani. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya, 2011.
[14] J. Creswell, “creswell_Research Mthods_Qual_Quant Mixed Methods Approaches.pdf,” Second Edition. hal. 137, 2003.
[15] A. . Miles, M.B; Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3, 3 ed. USA: Sage Publication, 2014.
[16] S. Hosmer, D. W; Lemeshow, Applied Logistic Regression Second Edition., 2 ed. New York, 2000.
[17] S. J. Neonbota, S. L; Kune, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Usahatani Padi Sawah Di Desa Haekto Kecamatan Noemuti Timur,” Agrimor, vol. 1, hal. 32–35, 2016.
[18] K. Ajunwa, U. Osuji, dan J. I. Njoku, “Full Length Research Paper A study of rural cassava farmers ’ participation in the Nigeria agricultural insurance scheme in Imo State ,” vol. 4, no. 1, hal. 203–208, 2016.
[19] K. Prasetyo dan A. Fariyanti, “Faktor Sosial Ekonomi Yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Petani Mengikuti Program Asuransi Usahatani Padi (Autp) Socio-Economic Factors Affecting Farmers’ Decisions To Join the Rice Farm Insurance (Autp) Program,” J. AgribiSains ISSN, vol. 5, no. 1, hal. 1–12, 2019.
[20] J. A. Hamidah, L.H; Sutrisno, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Petani Dalam Mengikuti Asuransi Usahatani Padi (Autp) Di Kabupaten Sukoharjo,” Agrisaintifika, vol. 5(1), hal. 40–46, 2021, doi: doi.org/10.32585/ags.v5i1.1319.
[21] D. W. S. Y. Heriyadi, D. Y; Sufyadi, “DINAMIKA RENDAHNYA KEPESERTAAN PELAKSANAAN ASURANSI USAHA TANI PADI (AUTP),” 2020.
[22] M. Farzaneh, M. S. Allahyari, C. A. Damalas, dan A. Seidavi, “Retraction notice to ‘Crop insurance as a risk management tool in agriculture: The case of silk farmers in northern Iran’ (Land Use Policy (2017) 64 (225–232), (S0264837716313904), (10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.018)),” Land use policy, vol. 89, no. October, hal. 104274, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104274.
[23] R. Khasanah, S. Suwarto, dan A. Wijianto, “Respons Petani Terhadap Program Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi (Autp) Di Kecamatan Adimulyo Kabupaten Kebumen,” AGRITEXTS J. Agric. Ext., vol. 44, no. 1, hal. 41, 2020, doi: 10.20961/agritexts.v44i1.41881.
[24] G. o T.-M. Kwadz, J. K. M. Kuwornu, dan I. S. B. Amadu, “Food Crop Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Market-Based Crop Insurance Scheme: Evidence from Ghana,” Res. Appl. Econ., vol. 5, no. 1, 2013, doi: 10.5296/rae.v5i1.2617.
[25] D. . Hardiana, J; Elwamendri; Nurchaini, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Petani Dalam Mengikuti Program Asuransi Usahatani Padi (Autp) Di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur,” J. Agribusineess Local Wisdom, vol. 2(2), hal. 1–14, 2019.
[26] B. Siswadi dan F. Syakir, “Respon petani terhadap program pemerintah mengenai Asuransi Usahatani Padi (AUTP),” Pros. Semin. Nas. Pembang. Pertan. 2016, vol. 53, no. 9, hal. 169–177, 2016.
[27] M. A. Mohammed dan G. F. Ortmann, “Factors influencing adoption of livestock insurance by commercial dairy farmers in three zobatat of eritrea,” Agrekon, vol. 44, no. 2, hal. 172–186, 2005, doi: 10.1080/03031853.2005.9523708.
[28] B. D. Akinola, “Determinants of Farmers’ Adoption of Agricultural Insurance: the Case of Poultry Farmers in Abeokuta Metropolis of Ogun State, Nigeria,” Br. J. Poult. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, hal. 36–41, 2014, doi: 10.5829/idosi.bjps.2014.3.2.83216.
[29] F. . Kawanishi, M; Guritno , C.S; Farid, “Assessment of Farmer Demand for Crop Insurance: A Case Study in Indonesia,” Japanese J. Risk Anal., vol. 26(1), hal. 31–39, 2016.
[30] I. Ismilaili, N. Purnaningsih, dan P. S. Asngari, “Tingkat Adopsi Inovasi Pengelolaan Tanaman Terpadu (PTT) Padi Sawah di Kecamatan Leuwiliang, Kabupaten Bogor,” J. Penyul., vol. 11, no. 1, hal. 49–59, 2015, doi: 10.25015/penyuluhan.v11i1.9931.
[31] P. D. Arimbawa dan A. . B. P. Widanta, “Pendapatan, Terhadap Padi, Petani Produktivitas Dengan Variabel, Sebagai Di, Intervening Mengwi, Kecamatan,” J. Ekon. Pembang. Univ. Udayana, vol. 6, no. 8, hal. 1601–1627, 2015.
[32] R. Budiarti, “Analisis Produksi Padi Di Kabupaten Sleman,” Dspace, hal. 1–15, 2018.
[33] N. E. Putri, M. Yamin, E. Anggraini, dan A. Hayati, “implemented . Therefore research or study is needed on farmers ’ perceptions of,” J. Ekon. Pertan., vol. 3, hal. 459–469, 2019.
[34] S. M. Pasaribu, “Pengembangan Program Asuransi Pertanian,” Ragam Pemikir. Memjawab isu Aktual Pertan., hal. 79–112, 2018.