Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities
Vol. 3 (2022): Proceedings of the 1st SENARA 2022
Articles

Business Feasibility Test and Community-Based Waste Management Model in Kutasari Village, Banyumas District : Uji Kelayakan Bisnis dan Model Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Masyarakat di Desa Kutasari, Kabupaten Banyumas

Article View
  • Dian Nora Herlina,
  • Yulina Tri Wahyuni,
  • Santi,
  • Faefaya Ziadatul Anisa,
  • Sodik Dwi Purnomo,
  • Diah Retnowati
Dian Nora Herlina
Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Purwokerto
Yulina Tri Wahyuni
Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Purwokerto
Santi
Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Purwokerto
Faefaya Ziadatul Anisa
Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Purwokerto
Sodik Dwi Purnomo
Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Purwokerto
Diah Retnowati
Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Purwokerto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v3i.190
Published June 2, 2022
Keywords
  • Business Feasibility,
  • Waste Management,
  • Waste Bank
How to Cite
Herlina, D. N., Wahyuni, Y. T., Santi, Anisa, F. Z., Purnomo, S. D., & Retnowati, D. (2022). Business Feasibility Test and Community-Based Waste Management Model in Kutasari Village, Banyumas District : Uji Kelayakan Bisnis dan Model Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Masyarakat di Desa Kutasari, Kabupaten Banyumas. Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3, 497-508. https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v3i.190

Copyright (c) 2022 Dian Nora Herlina, Yulina Tri Wahyuni, Santi, Faefaya Ziadatul Anisa, Sodik Dwi Purnomo, Diah Retnowati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The rate of population growth that increases every year is accompanied by the level of public consumption, which can trigger an increase in waste production which impacts the community. Therefore, the research objectives were 1) to identify the potential for waste management in Kutasari Village, Baturaden District Banyumas Regency; 2) analyze the business feasibility of a waste in Kutasari Village, Baturaden District Banyumas Regency from a financial perspective; 3) identify the driving and inhibiting factors in waste bank management management in Kutasari Village, Baturaden District Banyumas Regency; 4) identify stakeholders involved in waste bank management management in Kutasari Village, Baturaden District Banyumas Regency, and 5) formulate a waste bank management model management in Kutasari Village, Baturaden District Banyumas Regency. The research method was a mixed-method of the business feasibility method and the Miles and Huberman method. Furthermore, the determination of research location used the purposive sampling technique. The results showed that the waste bank was an alternative solution in waste management. Financially, this business was feasible to run. It could be seen from the R/C ratio value, which was 1.41. The driving factor in the management of waste banks was public awareness of the economic value of waste. In contrast, the inhibiting factor was the lack of community participation in innovation. Stakeholders involved in waste bank management were local governments, private institutions, universities, collectors, and the community. Then the formation of a waste management model is expected to improve the community's economy. In addition, this model sought to empower the community to increase household income sustainably.

Article View

References

  1. B. P. Statistik, Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020. 2022.
  2. A. Setiawan, “Membenahi Tata Kelola Sampah Nasional,” Indonesia.go.id, 2021. https://indonesia.go.id/kategori/indonesia-dalam-angka/2533/membenahi-tata-kelola-sampah-nasional.
  3. J. T. Pergub, Peraturan Gubernur Nomor 11 Tahun 2019 tentang Kebijakan dan Strategi Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga dan Sejenis Sampah Rumah Tangga. 2019.
  4. S. Widiyanto, Agnes Fitria; Pratiwi, Oktafiani Catur; Yuniarno, “Model Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga di Kabupaten Banyumas,” Prosiding, vol. 7, no. 1, hal. 488–499, 2017.
  5. A. Elza, Nurul Iqamah; Ekayani, Meti; Ismail, “Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Masyarakat: Layakkah Secara Finansial? (Studi Kasus: Bank Sampah Rangga Mekar),” J. Ekon. Pertan. dan Agribisnis, vol. 4, no. 2, hal. 335–342, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jepa.2020.004.02.11.
  6. A. Mutiarasyani, Yesie; Ekayani, Meti; Dea, “Analisis Kelayakanan dan Skala Pengelolaan Bank Sampah yang Berkelanjutan (Studi Kasus: Bank Sampah Srikandi Berdikari, Desa Pasarean, Kecamatan Pemijahan, Kabupaten Bogor),” Institut Pertanian Bogor, 2018.
  7. E. Triana, Anisa Putri; Sembiring, “Evaluasi Kinerja dan Keberlanjutan Program Bank Sampah Sebagai Salah Satu Pendekatan Dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Dengan Konsep 3R (Studi Kasus di Kota Cimahi),” J. Tek. Lingkung., vol. 24, no. 2, hal. 69–78, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.5614/j.tl.2019.25.1.2.
  8. I. Amelia, “Studi Kelayakan Usaha Tentang Pemanfaatan Sampah Plastik Untuk Peningkatan Ekonomi Masyarakat,” Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya, 2021.
  9. R. Afandi, Irfan; Fitria, Lisye; Rispianda, “Analisis Kelayakan Pengelolaan Sampah Organik di Kota X,” J. Online Inst. Teknol. Nas., vol. 2, no. 3, hal. 163–173, 2014.
  10. E. S. Syahbibah, Ismy Nur; Soedjono, “Studi Kriteria Perencanaan Bank Sampah Melalui Aplikasi Berbasis Android,” 2017.
  11. M. D. Siddiky, Mohammad Badry; Praptono, Budi; Astuti, “Analisis Kelayakan Usaha Bank Sampah di Kabupaten Bandung. Universitas Telkom, Bandung,” 2013.
  12. N. Kurniawan, “Analisis Kelayakan Usaha Pengolahan Sampah Kota Menjadi Produk yang Berguna di TPA Bantargebang,” 2009.
  13. D. Jamaludin, Abdul; Rachmina, “Analisis Kelayakan Usaha Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Komunitas di Provinsi DKI Jakarta,” 2014.
  14. G. Sumodiningrat, Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2009.
  15. Alfitri, Community Development, Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.
  16. T. Pathony, “Proses Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Melalui Gerakan Pemberdayaan dan Kesejahteraan Keluarga (PKK) di Kabupaten Subang,” Int. J. Demos, vol. 1, no. 2, hal. 262–289, 2019.
  17. H. Hamid, Manajemen Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Makassar: De La Macca, 2018.
  18. M. Hasan, “Pembinaan Ekonomi Kreatif dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Ekonomi,” J. Ekon. dan Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 1, hal. 81–86, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.26858/jekpend.v1i1.5063.
  19. R. A. Purnomo, Ekonomi Kreatif Pilar Pembangunan Indonesia. Surakarta: Ziyad Visi Media, 2016.
  20. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.
  21. M. Rahardja, Prathama; Manurung, Teori Ekonomi Makro. Jakarta: LP FEUI, 2001.
  22. N. G. Mankiw, Pengantar Ekonomi Mikro. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2011.
  23. A. Habib, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Produksi Jagung,” AGRIUM J. Ilmu Pertan., vol. 18, no. 1, hal. 1–12, 2015.
  24. D. Salvatore, Schaum’s Outlines Microeconomics. New York: Mc-Graw Hill Internasional, 2006.
  25. P. LHK, Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengelolaan Sampah Pada Bank Sampah. Indonesia, 2021.
  26. P. A. Shentika, “Pengelolaan Bank Sampah di Kota Probolinggo,” J. Ekon. dan Stud. Pembang., vol. 8, no. 1, hal. 92–100, 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um002v8i12016p092.
  27. E. Utami, Buku Panduan Sistem Bank Sampah dan 10 Kisah Sukses. Jakarta: Yayasan Unilever Indonesia, 2013.
  28. J. W. Cresswell, Research Design : Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2009.
  29. S. Sukirno, Ekonomi Pembangunan Proses, Masalah, dan Kebijakan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup, 2006.
  30. K. Suratiyah, Ilmu Usaha Tani. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya, 2015.
  31. S. Soekartawi, Ilmu Usahatani dan Penelitian untuk Pengembangan Petani Kecil. Jakarta: UI-Press, 2011.
  32. A. M. Miles, Matthew B; Hubermen, Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. United States Amerika Serikat: Sage Publications, 2014.
  33. Y. Putra, Hijrah Purnama; Yuriandala, “Studi Pemanfaatan Sampah Plastik Menjadi Produk dan Jasa Kreatif,” J. Sains dan Teknol. Lingkung., vol. 2, no. 3, hal. 21–31, 2010.
  34. N. Armadi, Made; Suarna, Wayan; Sudarma, Made; Mahendra, Made Sudiana; Sudipa, “Model Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Masyarakat di Kota Denpasar,” ECOTROPHIC, vol. 14, no. 2, hal. 131–142, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/EJES.2020.v14.i02.p04.
  35. S. H. Kholil, Eriyatno; Sutjahyo, “engembangan Model Kelembagaan Pengelolaan Sampah Kota dengan Metode ISM (Interpretative Structural Modeling) Studi Kasus di Jakarta Selatan,” Sodality J. Sosiol. Pedesaan, vol. 2, no. 1, hal. 31–48, 2008.
  36. A. Riswan, Riswan; Sunoko, Henna Riya, Hadiyarto, “Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga di Kecamatan Daha Selatan,” J. Ilmu Lingkung., vol. 9, no. 1, hal. 31–38, 2011.